Editorial Policy
Clear answers. Visible evidence.
We explain how things work, show what the evidence supports, and make important limits easy to check.
Effective
Sources and scope
We use primary research and official technical documentation where available. Articles link claims to sources and distinguish evidence, interpretation and fictional examples. If only an abstract or an author’s summary was accessible, we state that scope rather than imply the full paper or its data was independently checked.
Human review
TDQ scripts and research are adapted for the web with AI-assisted drafting and editing. A human reviews and approves the article revision before release. Video completion and approval of an article’s content are separate from permission to publish it. Material factual changes require renewed review. Human approval does not imply review by an independent subject-matter expert.
Models and comparisons
Interactive examples are simplified models, not measurements of a visitor’s behavior. We identify assumptions and invented figures. Any comparison must distinguish hands-on findings from provider claims and documented specifications; we do not invent product tests, ratings or user testimonials.
Dates and corrections
Preparation, source-review and publication dates mean different things. We do not substitute a preparation date for a publication date. Material factual corrections should explain what changed and show the update date. Send correction requests to the contact below.
Editorial independence
Payment must not buy a favorable conclusion. Sponsorships, affiliate relationships and other material commercial connections must be disclosed with the relevant content.
Contact
For general questions, corrections or privacy inquiries, contact QUESPERIA by email.